Best Known (125−45, 125, s)-Nets in Base 2
(125−45, 125, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 125, 66)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 130, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 65, 33)-net over F4, using
(125−45, 125, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (80, 125, 80)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 126, 80)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 63, 40)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 63, 40)-net over F4, using
(125−45, 125, 418)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 125, 419)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 124, 419)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 21 376238 957368 310409 347049 977072 618328 > 2124 [i]