Best Known (126−45, 126, s)-Nets in Base 2
(126−45, 126, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (81, 126, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (81, 132, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 66, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 66, 33)-net over F4, using
(126−45, 126, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (81, 126, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 63, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(126−45, 126, 433)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (81, 126, 434)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (81, 125, 434)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 44 010205 011145 650380 802166 885599 548112 > 2125 [i]