Best Known (184−45, 184, s)-Nets in Base 2
(184−45, 184, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 184, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (138, 184, 195)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 186, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 186, 195)-net over F2, using
(184−45, 184, 278)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (139, 184, 278)-net over F2, using
(184−45, 184, 2857)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 184, 2858)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (139, 183, 2858)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 305267 426630 015626 195809 503850 843156 347394 017373 103704 > 2183 [i]