Best Known (200−45, 200, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200−45, 200, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 200, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 23, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (132, 177, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 59, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 59, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 23, 5)-net over F2, using
(200−45, 200, 369)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 200, 369)-net over F2, using
(200−45, 200, 4751)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 200, 4752)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (155, 199, 4752)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 804335 556973 218366 748159 016351 136032 173581 893248 292288 387848 > 2199 [i]