Best Known (224−45, 224, s)-Nets in Base 2
(224−45, 224, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (177, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (177, 228, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (177, 228, 260)-net over F2, using
(224−45, 224, 562)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (179, 224, 562)-net over F2, using
(224−45, 224, 10158)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 224, 10159)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (179, 223, 10159)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 502915 024981 372699 687214 254186 631177 054134 432329 634404 326374 453582 > 2223 [i]