Best Known (229−45, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−45, 229, 267)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (184, 229, 267)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 25, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (3, 25, 7)-net over F2, using
(229−45, 229, 613)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (184, 229, 613)-net over F2, using
(229−45, 229, 11896)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (184, 229, 11897)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (184, 228, 11897)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 431 410194 932758 659355 732806 899193 950249 546855 002763 794639 896757 270548 > 2228 [i]