Best Known (136−46, 136, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136−46, 136, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 136, 68)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 138, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 69, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 69, 34)-net over F4, using
(136−46, 136, 98)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (90, 136, 98)-net over F2, using
(136−46, 136, 535)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 136, 536)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 90552 340478 576014 138488 755829 055783 475487 > 2136 [i]