Best Known (171, 171+46, s)-Nets in Base 2
(171, 171+46, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 217, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
(171, 171+46, 467)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 217, 467)-net over F2, using
(171, 171+46, 6491)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 217, 6492)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 210991 378298 773431 411593 119609 804963 341258 184963 950347 733030 229930 > 2217 [i]