Best Known (196, 196+46, s)-Nets in Base 2
(196, 196+46, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (196, 242, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (162, 208, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 34, 14)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+46, 714)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (196, 242, 714)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+46, 13827)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (196, 242, 13828)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 070884 413718 358037 261755 912939 302782 918473 700735 985030 657775 564742 492288 > 2242 [i]