Best Known (224−47, 224, s)-Nets in Base 2
(224−47, 224, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (177, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (177, 228, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
(224−47, 224, 494)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (177, 224, 494)-net over F2, using
(224−47, 224, 7784)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (177, 224, 7785)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (177, 223, 7785)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 486443 171741 951495 107769 027664 276308 366678 892376 403932 328902 361088 > 2223 [i]