Best Known (236−47, 236, s)-Nets in Base 2
(236−47, 236, 265)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (189, 236, 265)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 24, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 24, 5)-net over F2, using
(236−47, 236, 603)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (189, 236, 603)-net over F2, using
(236−47, 236, 11191)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (189, 236, 11192)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (189, 235, 11192)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55289 118694 152508 875771 914933 780269 665817 467952 094654 860408 908375 678705 > 2235 [i]