Best Known (162, 162+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 162+47, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 209, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 26, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (136, 183, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 61, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 61, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 26, 7)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+47, 384)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 209, 384)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+47, 4941)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 209, 4942)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 208, 4942)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 412 612106 404982 569964 608972 518355 827104 600754 398750 945380 338080 > 2208 [i]