Best Known (196, 196+47, s)-Nets in Base 2
(196, 196+47, 271)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (196, 243, 271)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 31, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (8, 31, 11)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+47, 677)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (196, 243, 677)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+47, 13827)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (196, 243, 13828)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (196, 242, 13828)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 070884 413718 358037 261755 912939 302782 918473 700735 985030 657775 564742 492288 > 2242 [i]