Best Known (210−48, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−48, 210, 198)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 210, 198)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 24, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (138, 186, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 62, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (0, 24, 3)-net over F2, using
(210−48, 210, 369)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 210, 369)-net over F2, using
(210−48, 210, 4185)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 210, 4186)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1652 578758 281699 038577 588911 058987 970426 201103 041930 114897 802669 > 2210 [i]