Best Known (227−48, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(227−48, 227, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 227, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (177, 227, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (177, 228, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (177, 228, 260)-net over F2, using
(227−48, 227, 488)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (179, 227, 488)-net over F2, using
(227−48, 227, 6860)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 227, 6861)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 215 902794 846613 575487 258289 966884 848829 132090 968029 946812 962064 587204 > 2227 [i]