Best Known (195, 195+48, s)-Nets in Base 2
(195, 195+48, 267)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (195, 243, 267)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 27, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (3, 27, 7)-net over F2, using
(195, 195+48, 634)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (195, 243, 634)-net over F2, using
(195, 195+48, 10911)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (195, 243, 10912)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 151524 504726 198959 608615 295370 653772 856026 543057 529662 445248 210131 507007 > 2243 [i]