Best Known (204−49, 204, s)-Nets in Base 2
(204−49, 204, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (154, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
(204−49, 204, 317)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 204, 317)-net over F2, using
(204−49, 204, 3412)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 204, 3413)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (155, 203, 3413)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 880065 423616 483101 230976 013353 780300 868721 532803 680606 395416 > 2203 [i]