Best Known (257−49, 257, s)-Nets in Base 2
(257−49, 257, 275)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (208, 257, 275)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 37, 15)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 14)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 15, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 14)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (13, 37, 15)-net over F2, using
(257−49, 257, 743)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (208, 257, 743)-net over F2, using
(257−49, 257, 15899)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (208, 257, 15900)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (208, 256, 15900)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115890 381453 505108 514311 225847 812517 168643 557554 287739 872289 450830 397329 644621 > 2256 [i]