Best Known (162, 162+49, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 162+49, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 211, 195)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
(162, 162+49, 355)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 211, 355)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+49, 4185)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 211, 4186)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 210, 4186)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1652 578758 281699 038577 588911 058987 970426 201103 041930 114897 802669 > 2210 [i]