Best Known (210−50, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−50, 210, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
(210−50, 210, 332)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 210, 332)-net over F2, using
(210−50, 210, 3400)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 210, 3401)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1645 999533 885631 889491 294456 522278 997961 749963 985916 783282 652968 > 2210 [i]