Best Known (163, 163+50, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 163+50, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (162, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
(163, 163+50, 348)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 213, 348)-net over F2, using
(163, 163+50, 3699)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 213, 3700)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13241 826344 964996 944396 007668 660334 010290 028398 555886 413594 159524 > 2213 [i]