Best Known (206−51, 206, s)-Nets in Base 2
(206−51, 206, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 206, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (154, 206, 195)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
(206−51, 206, 295)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 206, 295)-net over F2, using
(206−51, 206, 2955)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 206, 2956)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (155, 205, 2956)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 51 436209 709157 239924 095394 900527 490632 171691 685952 340157 830520 > 2205 [i]