Best Known (240−51, 240, s)-Nets in Base 2
(240−51, 240, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (189, 240, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
(240−51, 240, 505)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (189, 240, 505)-net over F2, using
(240−51, 240, 7645)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (189, 240, 7646)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (189, 239, 7646)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 886156 311460 993199 830068 042351 264566 664141 287787 831999 067204 119431 114457 > 2239 [i]