Best Known (159, 159+51, s)-Nets in Base 2
(159, 159+51, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (158, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
(159, 159+51, 315)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 210, 315)-net over F2, using
(159, 159+51, 3306)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 210, 3307)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 209, 3307)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 823 013854 074770 063134 245614 560199 317690 026671 361290 709235 717304 > 2209 [i]