Best Known (180, 180+51, s)-Nets in Base 2
(180, 180+51, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (180, 231, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
(180, 180+51, 439)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (180, 231, 439)-net over F2, using
(180, 180+51, 5948)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (180, 231, 5949)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (180, 230, 5949)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1728 156787 881858 787905 176339 268593 404542 010563 390195 540921 393720 649414 > 2230 [i]