Best Known (208, 208+52, s)-Nets in Base 2
(208, 208+52, 266)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (208, 260, 266)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
(208, 208+52, 646)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (208, 260, 646)-net over F2, using
(208, 208+52, 10765)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (208, 260, 10766)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 853689 706635 948432 447890 415919 570013 720142 801941 526857 552016 883314 587994 564544 > 2260 [i]