Best Known (174, 174+53, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174, 174+53, 198)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (174, 227, 198)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 26, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (148, 201, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (0, 26, 3)-net over F2, using
(174, 174+53, 373)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (174, 227, 373)-net over F2, using
(174, 174+53, 4326)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (174, 227, 4327)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (174, 226, 4327)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 108 359019 608851 666808 035019 247658 489997 086079 623655 032080 582626 253940 > 2226 [i]