Best Known (176, 176+53, s)-Nets in Base 2
(176, 176+53, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 229, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (148, 201, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
(176, 176+53, 385)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (176, 229, 385)-net over F2, using
(176, 176+53, 4565)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 229, 4566)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 228, 4566)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 433 277356 718312 447375 968281 728985 560190 156794 636687 799866 901457 739248 > 2228 [i]