Best Known (179, 179+53, s)-Nets in Base 2
(179, 179+53, 204)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 232, 204)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 31, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (148, 201, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (5, 31, 9)-net over F2, using
(179, 179+53, 402)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (179, 232, 402)-net over F2, using
(179, 179+53, 4948)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 232, 4949)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (179, 231, 4949)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3459 634126 489380 443267 340760 679092 341411 334677 888043 816409 544110 882000 > 2231 [i]