Best Known (163, 163+54, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 163+54, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 217, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (162, 217, 195)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
(163, 163+54, 303)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 217, 303)-net over F2, using
(163, 163+54, 2829)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 217, 2830)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 211248 838426 913255 265952 284985 552906 223047 681400 694701 755125 289120 > 2217 [i]