Best Known (144−55, 144, s)-Nets in Base 2
(144−55, 144, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 144, 66)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 148, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 74, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 74, 33)-net over F4, using
(144−55, 144, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (89, 144, 80)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 72, 40)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
(144−55, 144, 390)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 144, 391)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 143, 391)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11 214795 095758 306585 130589 999188 675150 676448 > 2143 [i]