Best Known (162, 162+55, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 162+55, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 217, 195)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
(162, 162+55, 289)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 217, 289)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+55, 2756)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 217, 2757)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 216, 2757)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105347 747040 149155 145147 554700 140112 909181 766363 114715 550037 508096 > 2216 [i]