Best Known (183, 183+56, s)-Nets in Base 2
(183, 183+56, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (183, 239, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 29, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 29, 5)-net over F2, using
(183, 183+56, 387)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (183, 239, 387)-net over F2, using
(183, 183+56, 4151)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (183, 239, 4152)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 886060 031071 993286 916967 601225 714780 211990 985563 201934 396956 960431 955260 > 2239 [i]