Best Known (189, 189+56, s)-Nets in Base 2
(189, 189+56, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (189, 245, 205)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (188, 244, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 34, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 34, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(189, 189+56, 421)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (189, 245, 421)-net over F2, using
(189, 189+56, 4822)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (189, 245, 4823)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 562131 923064 597739 303226 525442 792270 527714 801473 392338 672371 697477 173912 > 2245 [i]