Best Known (159−57, 159, s)-Nets in Base 2
(159−57, 159, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 159, 68)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (102, 162, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 81, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 81, 34)-net over F4, using
(159−57, 159, 98)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (102, 159, 98)-net over F2, using
(159−57, 159, 524)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 159, 525)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 158, 525)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 377312 631866 968216 067284 148139 570311 407179 053472 > 2158 [i]