Best Known (110, 110+57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(110, 110+57, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 167, 68)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (110, 178, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 89, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 89, 34)-net over F4, using
(110, 110+57, 72)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(110, 167, 72)-net in base 2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (110, 168, 72)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 84, 36)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (26, 35)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (52, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (52, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (26, 35)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 84, 36)-net in base 4, using
(110, 110+57, 114)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (110, 167, 114)-net over F2, using
(110, 110+57, 647)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 167, 648)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 166, 648)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 94 468957 667000 992161 270596 538113 413674 945825 391696 > 2166 [i]