Best Known (184, 184+57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(184, 184+57, 198)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (184, 241, 198)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 28, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (0, 28, 3)-net over F2, using
(184, 184+57, 380)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (184, 241, 380)-net over F2, using
(184, 184+57, 4256)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (184, 241, 4257)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (184, 240, 4257)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 770994 374580 105442 171016 227389 814052 764166 175587 465178 969078 681433 259480 > 2240 [i]