Best Known (187, 187+57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(187, 187+57, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (187, 244, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 31, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 31, 7)-net over F2, using
(187, 187+57, 397)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (187, 244, 397)-net over F2, using
(187, 187+57, 4587)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (187, 244, 4588)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (187, 243, 4588)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 137368 124781 174712 294645 923613 829841 559632 051207 722061 256770 159900 660520 > 2243 [i]