Best Known (191, 191+57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(191, 191+57, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (191, 248, 205)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (190, 247, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 34, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 34, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(191, 191+57, 420)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (191, 248, 420)-net over F2, using
(191, 191+57, 5069)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (191, 248, 5070)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (191, 247, 5070)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 226 385245 135309 265510 116332 296868 955618 131035 283347 021277 748873 507131 328284 > 2247 [i]