Best Known (129, 129+58, s)-Nets in Base 2
(129, 129+58, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 187, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 192, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 96, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 96, 56)-net over F4, using
(129, 129+58, 156)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (129, 187, 156)-net over F2, using
(129, 129+58, 976)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 187, 977)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 196 268570 435343 062540 112816 715043 079150 457034 243150 394208 > 2187 [i]