Best Known (251−59, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(251−59, 251, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (192, 251, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 32, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 32, 7)-net over F2, using
(251−59, 251, 399)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (192, 251, 399)-net over F2, using
(251−59, 251, 4551)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (192, 251, 4552)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (192, 250, 4552)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1816 513746 928377 559841 327278 188281 559536 718722 018830 159323 633342 139116 842072 > 2250 [i]