Best Known (253−59, 253, s)-Nets in Base 2
(253−59, 253, 204)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (194, 253, 204)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 34, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (5, 34, 9)-net over F2, using
(253−59, 253, 411)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (194, 253, 411)-net over F2, using
(253−59, 253, 4776)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (194, 253, 4777)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (194, 252, 4777)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7267 223883 156406 302688 080199 050905 818404 151787 276743 880553 478653 821315 256304 > 2252 [i]