Best Known (196, 196+59, s)-Nets in Base 2
(196, 196+59, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (196, 255, 205)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (195, 254, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 35, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 35, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(196, 196+59, 423)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (196, 255, 423)-net over F2, using
(196, 196+59, 5012)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (196, 255, 5013)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (196, 254, 5013)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29070 390622 192070 127917 236224 882538 172941 984111 181641 030886 217102 826488 882208 > 2254 [i]