Best Known (259−60, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−60, 259, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (199, 259, 205)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (198, 258, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 36, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 36, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(259−60, 259, 427)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (199, 259, 427)-net over F2, using
(259−60, 259, 4738)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (199, 259, 4739)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 929393 035614 087337 733898 999402 169039 778477 097758 014484 770682 843002 553430 045024 > 2259 [i]