Best Known (257−61, 257, s)-Nets in Base 2
(257−61, 257, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (196, 257, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 32, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (164, 225, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 75, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 75, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 32, 6)-net over F2, using
(257−61, 257, 397)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (196, 257, 397)-net over F2, using
(257−61, 257, 4418)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (196, 257, 4419)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (196, 256, 4419)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116416 930969 986772 568842 134442 498588 013107 434473 585098 304370 603161 639233 311600 > 2256 [i]