Best Known (144, 144+61, s)-Nets in Base 2
(144, 144+61, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 205, 112)-net over F2, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 222, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 111, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 111, 56)-net over F4, using
(144, 144+61, 186)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (144, 205, 186)-net over F2, using
(144, 144+61, 1298)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 205, 1299)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 204, 1299)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 124127 128023 129509 363882 078519 104655 850986 578088 762387 271488 > 2204 [i]