Best Known (210−65, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−65, 210, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 210, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 224, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 112, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 112, 56)-net over F4, using
(210−65, 210, 173)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 210, 173)-net over F2, using
(210−65, 210, 1136)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 210, 1137)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 209, 1137)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 837 395642 551291 890995 366323 287730 869575 625469 416993 354698 628649 > 2209 [i]