Best Known (219−65, 219, s)-Nets in Base 2
(219−65, 219, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (154, 219, 112)-net over F2, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 121, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 121, 56)-net over F4, using
(219−65, 219, 198)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (154, 219, 198)-net over F2, using
(219−65, 219, 1390)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (154, 219, 1391)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (154, 218, 1391)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 422790 173999 877866 690023 625769 454693 481850 597044 822934 203599 029795 > 2218 [i]