Best Known (210−66, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−66, 210, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 210, 112)-net over F2, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 222, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 111, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 111, 56)-net over F4, using
(210−66, 210, 167)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (144, 210, 167)-net over F2, using
(210−66, 210, 1035)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 210, 1036)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1649 763301 909629 901559 155622 521646 070576 968045 242510 102706 535136 > 2210 [i]