Best Known (159, 159+67, s)-Nets in Base 2
(159, 159+67, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- 26 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 252, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 126, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 126, 56)-net over F4, using
(159, 159+67, 204)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 226, 204)-net over F2, using
(159, 159+67, 1437)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 226, 1438)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 225, 1438)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55 026386 645007 458053 832641 835612 041315 919533 223826 486656 927447 827828 > 2225 [i]